Oliver Crawford vs Hyeon Chung Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing recent performances, Chung has won 40.79% of points on their second serve in the past six months, whereas Crawford has a slightly better record, securing 45.39% of such points. This statistic is frequently linked with predicting match outcomes accurately. Similarly, when examining return game metrics, Chung has successfully won 43.75% of their opponent's second serve points recently, while Crawford marginally leads with 43.98% in the same category. When considering returns against first serves, Chung holds an edge at 31.13%, outperforming Crawford who stands at 26.78%.

Under pressure, a notable difference emerges between the players. Chung's breakpoint save rate is at 42.61%, which is considerably overshadowed by Crawford saving 56.88% of breakpoints faced. This insight carries significant weight in live betting scenarios. Concurrently, match win percentages from the previous year reflect that Chung claimed victory in 65.22% of encounters (W/L 15/8) compared to Crawford's slightly lower 63.08% (W/L 41/24). Such overall win-loss records furnish a broader understanding of head-to-head predictions.

Surface performance statistics reveal that both players have their strongest surface success on hard courts, with each boasting a win percentage of 69%. However, their performance on grass is notably weaker, with Chung winning only 20% of matches (W/L 2/8) and Crawford having yet to win (W/L 0/1). A close examination of match levels showcases that Chung has predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, achieving a 70% win rate (W/L 14/6), while Crawford competed at the same level but claimed a more impressive 77.27% of matches (W/L 34/10).

The caliber of opponents also highlights key differences; Chung faced players with an average rank of 290.96 over the past year, while Crawford played against players ranked, on average, at 408.29. In predicting outcomes for matches extending to a deciding set, the advantage lies with Crawford winning 56% of concluding sets compared to Chung's 33% success rate. It's critical to leverage these live decision-making statistics, especially when the game is at a crucial stage.

Considering recent behavior in terms of breakpoint conversion, Chung converted 33.04% of opportunities while Crawford performed slightly better, converting 34.03%. This subtle yet important quotient is pivotal during live betting or match predictions when either faces their pivotal points. Based on these statistics, Crawford appears more likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match, judging by consistent performance indicators across various metrics.